Global Reaction Mounts to US-Led Airstrikes in Syria
VOA - Sunday 15th April, 2018
International reaction to joint U.S., French and British air strikes against government targets in Syria Saturday morning ranged from support to intense criticism, depending largely on which countries the reaction came from.
The U.S. Department of Defense said the strikes targeted three sites that are believed to be linked to the production of chemical and biological weapons. The attacks were retaliation for suspected chemical attacks near Damascus last weekend that killed more than 40 people.
U.S. President Donald Trump commended Britain and France for the joint air strikes.
Get Adobe Flash Player Embed share President Trump Announces Strikes Against Syria Embed share The code has been copied to your clipboard. width px height px The URL has been copied to your clipboard No media source currently available
0:00 0:07:40 0:00
'A perfectly executed strike last night,' Trump tweeted hours after the attack. 'Thank you to France and the United Kingdom for their wisdom and the power of their fine Military. Could not have had a better result. Mission Accomplished!'
Syria's Foreign Ministry said, however, it 'condemns in the strongest terms the brutal American-British-French aggression against Syria, which constitutes a flagrant violation of international law.'
Hundreds of Syrians gathered around the capital of Damascus Saturday, honking car horns, flashing victory signs and waving Syrian flags in defiance of the joint military strikes. Some shouted, 'We are your men, Bashar,' references to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Syrian government supporters wave national flags and chant slogans against U.S. President Trump during demonstrations following a wave of U.S., British and French military strikes, Saturday, 14, 2018.
Russian President Vladimir Putin described the attacks as an 'act of aggression against a sovereign government' and accused the U.S. of exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in war-torn Syria.
Russia's foreign ministry said the airstrikes were a failure, maintaining the majority of the rockets fired were intercepted by the Syrian government's air defense systems.
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the attacks constitute a criminal act and that U.S., France and Britain will not benefit from them.
'This morning's attack on Syria is a crime,' Khamenei said on Twitter. 'I firmly declare that the Presidents of U.S. and France and British PM committed a major crime. They will gain no benefit; just as they did not while in Iraq, Syria & Afghanistan, over the past years, committing the same criminal acts.'
China's foreign ministry called Saturday for an independent investigation into the suspected chemical attacks and said a political solution is the only way to resolve the issue. Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said China has consistently opposed the use of force in international relations and that any military action that circumvented the U.N. Security Council violated the basic norms of international law.
But British Prime Minister Theresa May said there was 'no practicable alternative to the use of force' against Syria.
'I judge this action to be in Britain's national interest,' May said. 'We cannot allow the use of chemical weapons to be normalized within Syria, on the streets of the U.K., or anywhere else in the world. We would have preferred an alternative path but, on this occasion, there is none.'
In France, reaction has been mixed to President Emmanuel Macron's decision to participate in the attacks against the Syrian regime.
French Minister for Foreign Affairs Jean-Yves Le Drian, right, and French Defense Minister Florence Parly give an official statement in the press room after attending an emergency meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace, in Paris, Saturday, April 14, 2018.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said Saturday the joint military action was justified, limited, proportionate and successful.
'A large part of his chemical arsenal has been destroyed,' Le Drian told France's BFMTV in an interview, referring to the Syrian leader.
Far left and far right lawmakers sharply criticized France's decision to join the United States in the strikes.
Conservative National Front leader Marine Le Pen, who lost the 2017 presidential race to Macron, warned via Twitter France risked its status as an 'independent power' and said the strikes could lead to 'unforeseen and potentially dramatic consequences.'
Far left politician Jean-Luc Melenchon also denounced France's participation on Twitter, calling the strikes an 'irresponsible escalation' that did not have European or French parliament support.
Germany, Canada, Australia and Japan expressed support for the air strikes. European Council President Donald Tusk said the bloc 'will stand with our allies on the side of justice.'
In Turkey, the airstrikes were also well received.
'We welcome this operation which has eased humanity's conscience in the face of the attack in Douma, largely suspected to have been carried out by the regime,' Turkey's Foreign Ministry said. The ministry added that Syria 'has a proven track record of crimes against humanity and war crimes.'
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg speaks during a media conference at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Saturday, April 14, 2018.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said those who use chemical weapons 'must be held accountable.'
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned all sides must comply with international law and not dismiss Moscow's warning that air strikes on its ally could lead to war.
'I urge all member states to show restraint in these dangerous circumstances and to avoid any acts that could escalate the situation and worsen the suffering of the Syrian people,' Guterres said in a statement.
When talking about American independent cinema, there is before Steven Soderbergh's sex, lies, and videotape and after. Debuting at the Sundance Film Festival in 1989, Soderbergh's debut feature, shot for just over $1.25 million when he was 26 years old ...
LONDON - Depending on who you talk to a second Brexit referendum is either the only way to break months of deadlock in Britain's House of Commons or a beguiling idea that would worsen deep politica ...